Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1327

reference
883-tree-1
name
1327
tree-preservation-order

undefined

883-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013587 50.878229)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013530 50.878223,-1.013533 50.878234,-1.013540 50.878244,-1.013553 50.878252,-1.013569 50.878257,-1.013586 50.878259,-1.013604 50.878257,-1.013620 50.878252,-1.013632 50.878245,-1.013641 50.878235,-1.013644 50.878224,-1.013641 50.878212,-1.013633 50.878202,-1.013621 50.878194,-1.013605 50.878189,-1.013588 50.878187,-1.013570 50.878189,-1.013554 50.878194,-1.013541 50.878202,-1.013533 50.878212,-1.013530 50.878223)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL